The Philosopher's Stone vs monoatomics

This is the History Forum, including Real history, Alternative history, Imaginary history, and maybe even Future history.

Re: The Philosopher's Stone vs monoatomics

Postby Acolyte on Sat Oct 24, 2009 3:51 pm

EDITED BY MODERATOR

Sometimes we need to know something is possible before we can try getting there ourselves. Perhaps once the path is laid out, we can work back to it without the crutch or aid. One of the most convincing experiences I had on my path towards spirituality came from Shaman's Sage - it showed me that my perceptions were simply that, that a slight alteration in how I perceive could change the universe around me in a drastic fashion.

Likewise a poster I have of the Milky Way seen in 10 different frequencies altered my way of seeing things as I realised that we could literally be in a cosmos that we have no experience of simply because we operate at the wrong frequency.

So I think, an adult who is cautious & willing to think things through beforehand & then take appropriate steps to minimise risk, should then be willing to try new things. If the ORME or some other version of 'Stone' can lift one's vision beyond the mundane, I say go for it.

Take care Albedoen, & go where your heart AND mind lead. It is your life, not ours. If you wish to share what you want to try for an outside view of it, let me know.

Namaskar.
User avatar
Acolyte
Brandmeister
Brandmeister
 
Posts: 368
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2008 4:40 am

Re: The Philosopher's Stone vs monoatomics

Postby Acolyte on Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:53 pm

for dorman...
Image

:lol: :lol:
User avatar
Acolyte
Brandmeister
Brandmeister
 
Posts: 368
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2008 4:40 am

Re: The Philosopher's Stone vs monoatomics

Postby Dorman1 on Sat Oct 24, 2009 8:35 pm

Trolls eat kitty kats! how desssspicable!
User avatar
Dorman1
Door Man One
Door Man One
 
Posts: 569
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 10:45 pm

Re: The Philosopher's Stone vs monoatomics

Postby Albedoen on Sun Oct 25, 2009 2:05 am

Acolyte wrote:My perceptions were simply that, that a slight alteration in how I perceive could change the universe around me in a drastic fashion.

Likewise a poster I have of the Milky Way seen in 10 different frequencies altered my way of seeing things as I realised that we could literally be in a cosmos that we have no experience of simply because we operate at the wrong frequency.


Hey Acolyte - very nice way to put it!

I agree a lot with this point of view - and it is a fresh reminder among this discussion to see who "is the really real one who is right, and who will make all others wrong".

Now the guys at http://www.treasurealchemy.com don't put Hudson down at all, they seem to be grateful for his work (they praise him in a video) - but also acknowledge that Hudson's work is not the end of the road (in their own words).

And the only decently justified warnings for monoaomics I could find is here: http://educate-yourself.org/cn/monoatomicgoldthinktwice15aug05.shtml.

Anyways, this discussion is becoming more like a contest of opinion and angry reaction than a constructive-documented exchange of perspectives as I had hope it would be.

Thanks for your help though!
Albedoen
Sprite
Sprite
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 9:40 am

Re: The Philosopher's Stone vs monoatomics

Postby Acolyte on Sun Oct 25, 2009 3:09 am

Hang in there, Albedoen... the egoistic confrontations will pass & maybe we can come back to the subject. Unfortunately I cannot be authoritative on the subject - I haven't tried it & am unlikely to be able to get any for some months. I'd be interested in your experience - if not here, perhaps in PM?

You're right the treasurealchemy site is different to the first & even references Halexandria as a source (re the Meisner effect) but it is still expensive. le sigh...
User avatar
Acolyte
Brandmeister
Brandmeister
 
Posts: 368
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2008 4:40 am

Re: The Philosopher's Stone vs monoatomics

Postby Acolyte on Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:54 am

This could be onfiaa except such are notoriously alone in their sad lives...

Image

Go away troll!
User avatar
Acolyte
Brandmeister
Brandmeister
 
Posts: 368
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2008 4:40 am

Re: The Philosopher's Stone vs monoatomics

Postby Dorman1 on Mon Oct 26, 2009 7:24 am

The word youth can't be a symbol for a large body of people? and if so, not if it was already used in a specific manner? oh well, thanks for the English language writing course OnFiaaahhh. For some reason, I imagine you somewhere screaming loudly. Acolyte, the mirror probably verified the nose. i only had time for a few minutes here before rushing off to work. I think Albedoen is OK. This was one time where I decided to just simply be a jerk to someone, anyone. Albedoen, I hope I didn't give you any scars with my words. I've seen SOL be three times worse, and more than once. Oh no, I'm being a democrat: pointing to bad behavior of others to validate my own.

Onfiaaahhhhhhhhh aaahhhhhhh, mellowwwww OUT. I'm warming up my black helicopter. shining my black sunglasses.
User avatar
Dorman1
Door Man One
Door Man One
 
Posts: 569
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 10:45 pm

Re: The Philosopher's Stone vs monoatomics

Postby OnFiaaa on Mon Oct 26, 2009 10:36 pm

hi dorman.

you are weird; transparently overly-psychological. but that's ok man, some of us just don't undersatand the world as others will!

if it were true, and i AM on fire, yes, i will be screaming. but alas it is not, and i am ok.

i am mellow, that's what i have been saying all along: i have the philosopher's stone.

i can hardly believe that, in a forum dedicated to searching for truth, peace and wellbeing, when a voice says "i have found the stone" you delete it.

what sort of a person are you?

H__P__ _____k_r

that's right. you are a hippo fucker. see?



this all started because of your stupid comments:
Dorman1 wrote:"You may seem to perceive my assumption of youth on your part, when I'm only aware of this public forum being open to youth. The latter seem to be self contained with all they could ever need"


you talk in such an asinine way that you really completely are a jerk. it doesn't matter how much you hurt the guy or if he even cares at all, the point is this is how you interact with people and there is something fundamentally wrong with you.

Dorman1 wrote:The word youth can't be a symbol for a large body of people?


sure youth can be a symbol of a group of people, and it IS. the fact is you mentioned the truth in your sentence,

Dorman1 wrote:... and if so, not if [youth] was already used in a specific manner?


not in the same sentence when there are but 2 subjects in said sentence, no. =/

why are you pretending that you don't understand this is just verbosity in its shiniest form, and contains nothing of value or sanity? it is obviously not a typo, but your brain certainly misread something...


Dorman1 wrote:oh well, thanks for the English language writing course OnFiaaahhh.


your very welcome.


Dorman1 wrote:Onfiaaahhhhhhhhh aaahhhhhhh, mellowwwww OUT. I'm warming up my black helicopter. shining my black sunglasses.


"black helicopter" ?

is that your slang "rub one out", or what? and the glasses are your balls? obviously somebody who takes the time to delete my comments cause he is embarrassed over what an oaf he is does not have a helicopter, and certainly not a black one. so, you are an idiot.

bye.


ps if anybody is interested in hearing about the REAL philosopher's stone, and is smart enough not to ingest heavy metals like ORMUS, then you can talk to me peace
OnFiaaa
Sprite
Sprite
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 12:47 am

Re: The Philosopher's Stone vs monoatomics

Postby OnFiaaa on Tue Oct 27, 2009 1:31 am

uh oh,

he sees me.
OnFiaaa
Sprite
Sprite
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 12:47 am

Re: The Philosopher's Stone vs monoatomics

Postby Dorman1 on Tue Oct 27, 2009 7:29 am

Me? just being silly as usual. "Administrateur" is a term akin to "Toam" a mix between derision and rarely a compliment. I don't have the authority to delete you from this forum. I'm actually a worker making a subsistent existence. Perhaps your fun here is not appreciated by others. Personally, very little energy or duration of thought concerning you as the focus of it exists within my universe. I only type this message because I can type fast --without even looking at the keyboard! isn't that impressive?hehehe--- and little energy was required for the thought.
User avatar
Dorman1
Door Man One
Door Man One
 
Posts: 569
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 10:45 pm

Re: The Philosopher's Stone vs monoatomics

Postby xamo on Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:05 pm

Fake gold bars in Bank of England and Fort Knox, page 1
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&sour ... f&aqi=&oq=

Questions:Where real is our Earth gold.What is it real cost?

Why Nibiru is coming at this moment?
xamo
Sprite
Sprite
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 10:17 am

Re: The Philosopher's Stone vs monoatomics

Postby Angel on Tue Feb 09, 2010 3:11 am

Well that was interesting... lol

I am interested in the Philosopher stone that is without heavy metals, so if you are still around might you be up to enlightening me on this? Thanks in advance.

The xamo comment was a bit hard for me to understand, and perhaps we should install other language modules on the forum for easier communication with our international friends? I will see what I can do on this subject. Now as far as Nibiru is concernd Xamo, I don't think I would spend too much time worrying about that, as it is unlikekly there is any truth in that to be honest, and trust me, I have looked into it. If Nibiru was actually a planet orbiting our 2nd Sun then we would not only see it before Nibiru, we would certainly feel it long before we saw it, as anything that massive would disrupt the entire solar system simply by its approach. There are far too many anateur astronomers out there and we will know when or if it is coming even if our governments don't plan to tell us about it.

A little sapping between intellects or even age difference can and is a healthy and enlightening experience for all involved if each allow themselves to stay open minded and learn from the other. The situation becomes a problem only if disrepect and name calling begins. This can not be tollerated in an open forum because no matter what opinion you or others have, EVERYONE has a right to be heard and MUST be free and without worry that their opinions will be welcomed and without ridicule. I am somewhat unhappy about SOME of the comments here but they were some time ago and therefore will not be addressed , however, please understand that we want to have the thoughts you and everyone think about and an open, respectful manner is how each of us will conduct ourselves when it comes to posting on this forum. Now, if you want to cuss someone out in private message, go for it, if that m,akes you happy, but in public, lets try and rise above it all, despite where we live and wallow . ok? Thanks.

P.S. I am serious about wanting to ghear about the Philosophers stone so I hope you will be up to sharing that info with me.
Peace ...xx
User avatar
Angel
Brandmeister
Brandmeister
 
Posts: 269
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 11:26 pm

Previous

Return to All History

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron