Precession of the equinox connection

[Acolyte]

I've wondered about the tetrahedral connection for some time. It puzzles me as to why it would be there. Richard Hoagland talks about it as well. I don't quite get why planets & the Sun would be governed in such a way - what does a tetrahedron have to do with a sphere?

I wonder if it is something akin to the Lagrange Points, those rather strange places where the forces that control the path of planets & moons provide null points where mass can agglomerate.

[DocPtah]

Obviously, the reason for tetrahedrals, spheres and the like in the solar system is that the creator of the universe is a mathematician... and is particularly fond of geometry.

If, for example, one checks out A Book of Coincidence -- or even the Satellites of Jupiter, it should become obvious that the solar system is subject to the "forces of geometry". One might as well ask why electrons are constrained to specific energy levels with respect to each atom. (And if there is any failings in Physics, one of the most important in the unwillingness to ask "Why?" ...albeit the reason is mostly about how hard the answers would be to come by.)

Ultimately, an understanding of the "forces of geometry" is likely to lead to a better understanding of physics and quite possibly any other endeavor.

[forseen]

Acolte , read my post in 090909. Looks like i should have posted it here but i'm working the nine system. I assigned a value of 720 on the tetrahedon and 19.5 times 360 = 7020. Coincedence? That's the vortex 19.5 ? I placed the value of a sphere at 1080 and 720+360 = 1080. Then 720 times 3 = the value of a cube of 2160. I'm starting to remove all my zero's, maybe.

[forseen]

you can also look at numerology - a sacred science or world - mysteries. com

[Dorman1]

Something about contemplating polyhedrons aids comprehension beyond familiar dimensions.

[forseen]

formation of planets, i was writing a book that had the formation of planets in it, and then watched a tv show with a man talking about accretion. When i saw this it made me hurry up and just write an article on this because i wanted my theory out there first because it's all about accretion. I was upset he coined the phrase before i did, but he did not know the whole process. Since then i wrote the life cycle of planets which is now being studied. So here is my theory in short form. The sun is a ball of fire which as we all know burns, Anything that burns expells carbons. Our whole planet is made of carbon. As these carbons are discharged into space some of them become trapped by the magnetic field, the force of gravity and temperature barriers.These carbon particles accrete at these points. But we also know anything that burns shrinks as it expells its fuel, with that said, i believe that pluto was the first planet and mercury is right now our last, Because i believe all planets have a metalic core and for a metalic core to form will need a lot of heat to cause metalic particles to accrete. These planets have to have a metalic core to stay in the suns magnetic grip. Another proof my theory is correct is that mars used to be covered in water but now isn't and thats because mars is moving away from the sun or the sun is shrinking or both and now the earth is covered in water because it is the perfect tamperature for water to form, Just like fog forms on your windshields. It's the same process. Temperature forms moisture. As these planets get farther away from the sun and begin to cool they will start expelling its moistures. This is a short version of my theory but if you're interested in more, reply to this and i respond as much as i can.

[Dorman1]

That is interesting foreseen. Do you think a beam flows with ganglions along its course, which form due to various similar force/substances collecting sequentially: more ethereal down to the more substantial?

[Acolyte]

Ok, first, this is decidedly off-topic forseen, and I am fairly sure this isn't going to go well, but I will try my best...

formation of planets, i was writing a book that had the formation of planets in it, and then watched a tv show with a man talking about accretion. When i saw this it made me hurry up and just write an article on this because i wanted my theory out there first because it's all about accretion. I was upset he coined the phrase before i did, but he did not know the whole process. Since then i wrote the life cycle of planets which is now being studied. So here is my theory in short form.

Accretion is not the only possibility. Velikovsky 'saw' a violent past where accretion involved planets & large masses ripping & tearing at each other as they snooker-balled around the system. electric Universe sees a markedly different paradigm. Accretion is not a new term, it was being bandied about at the least, back in the 1950's

The sun is a ball of fire which as we all know burns, Anything that burns expells carbons

There're 2 current theories for the Sun, neither of which is a 'ball of fire' that burns. One is that it is a thermonuclear furnace, which in no way 'burns' & the other main one is that of again, the Electric Universe, in which the Sun is an arc point, fed by electric & magnetic fields that permeate the galaxy. The Sun doesn't, & can't burn in the way you are supposing.

Our whole planet is made of carbon.

Um... no, it isn't. Carbon is just one element of the planet. it happens to be the basis for most of the life forms here, but that certainly doesn't mean carbon is even the most plentiful element of Earth. While it may be true that the elements that make up Earth came from nova stars, (supposing the Standard Model is correct) they could not have come from the Sun - it is still a mostly hydrogen ball making helium - it is, thankfully, nowhere near the carbon cycle yet, & hopefully not approaching the iron cycle for a LOOOONG time to come.

As these carbons are discharged into space some of them become trapped by the magnetic field, the force of gravity and temperature barriers.These carbon particles accrete at these points.

Carbon is non-magnetic - you can test this by waving a magnet over charcoal or other form of carbon. If you have an old style pencil handy, you could try that - not only is there carbon in the wood casing, the 'lead' is graphite, a form of pure carbon. I'm betting the maget doesn't lift the pencil or even make it move.

But we also know anything that burns shrinks as it expells its fuel, with that said, i believe that pluto was the first planet and mercury is right now our last,

As above, the Sun isn't 'burning' so this doesn't apply.

Because i believe all planets have a metalic core and for a metalic core to form will need a lot of heat to cause metalic particles to accrete. These planets have to have a metalic core to stay in the suns magnetic grip.

I'm not sure where you get that idea - the major metallic cores are in Earth & possibly Jupiter. Jupiter is a maybe because they think it might be metallic hydrogen, ie. hydrogen compressed down to the point where it forms a lattice structure. Earth has a molten metallic core giving us a magnetosphere. Venus doesn't seem to have anything like the same magnetosphere, nor does Mars, so if they have metallic cores, they are solid.
We're pretty sure Saturn, Uranus & Neptune don't have cores at all, although that isn't backed by a lot of evidence. They don't, however, have large magnetic fields so it would seem to contraindicate the presence of a metallic one.

Another proof my theory is correct is that mars used to be covered in water but now isn't and thats because mars is moving away from the sun or the sun is shrinking or both and now the earth is covered in water because it is the perfect tamperature for water to form, Just like fog forms on your windshields. It's the same process. Temperature forms moisture. As these planets get farther away from the sun and begin to cool they will start expelling its moistures. This is a short version of my theory but if you're interested in more, reply to this and i respond as much as i can.

Actually, Earth is only allowed liquid water because of the greenhouse effect - we are actually outside the 'bio-zone' NASA is looking in for habitable planets. But ignoring that... fog forms on the windshield because there is water already present & when it hits the coolth of the glass, it precipitates & forms droplets on the surface. It isn't 'forming' as you would have it. Water, that is, H2O can form under many conditions & the conditions decide whether it forms as gas, liquid or solid. It's even possible there's a plasma form of water - certainly we're finding out some very strange & interesting things about how water behaves.

Temperature doesn't form water - if you wish to get into details, look into some chemistry about covalence bonding & how molecules form. If anything, high temperatures (such as the Sun) would destroy molecular bonds & prevent them from forming.

Mars is not devoid of water because it is moving away from the Sun - it isn't moving away. It is (perhaps) lacking water because it lost its atmosphere. Once the pressure drops, water 'boils' at ever lower temperatures, so the water would evaporate rapidly into an ever-decreasing atmosphere. That's if it isn't still there under the surface of course.

I think you will find that, by evidence, the Sun is actually increasing in size, not shrinking. If the Standard Model is correct, this is a process that will continue for the next several billion years until the hydrogen runs out & the Sun turns into a red giant star, with a surface somewhere out around Earth's orbit.

It is good to think of hypotheses, but one must be careful that one uses the available evidence rather than personal beliefs to try to turn the hypothesis into a Theory. I'm hoping your book was about something else & the planet formation was merely a sidebar. If not, I think you have a lot of work in front of you.

[ozziegem]

This is my feable attempt to go back to relevance of this thread ...albiet it may at first make very little sense..
Would like comment on a partial[ Edited to protect the guilty.....]
I shall also in my other threads attempt and ongoing interesting journey that I have deliciously encounted on Halex over the past few months ,more so behind the scenes { P/M}'S .....WHOOPS THAT ACTUALLY LOOKS LIKE wOMEN going through the change ...although these encounters behind the scenes are actually all female funnily enough.. This is as was said Partial....

regards ,,positive of course....Gem


interesting as I have been drawn back in as of late (rather in sync with you and your friend Su) about the alignment that is occurring in 2012. I had no idea that it was not common knowledge that we are a binary system...meaning our sun has a fellow sun it orbits. The peak in which those two suns will align (or be at the closest points) is predicted to be on 2012. Oddly to me that not many people know that...also the supposed star that brings destruction known as The Destroyer, or Nibura is that second sun..funny to me that I never knew its name and was vastly confused at what people had been saying about such a star existing between Mars and Earth but now I understand what people were attempting to discuss. MANY cultures from Jesus predicting the appearance of the star to Mayans, Incans and other Southwestern cultures show symbolism of a bright star in which they associate with "apocalyptic' pictures. I am not sure why it is not common knowledge of the binary system, I was taught it in school, I think maybe because some still think that the system is not part of our solar system. It is highly argued since it is so far away and takes quite a bit of time to orbit (36K years) that is not close enough to be considered a Binary solar system. But, the sun has planets associated with it and even scientist are interested in these planets for potential microbial life. I do not know the qualifications for what makes a system binary or not, nor do I care, if in my opinion, a star or planet is close enough to have or induce a physiological effect on a system, then it should be considered a Binary or at least part of that system as it is then effecting the transitions of that system.

To be contined.....

[ozziegem]

Another Letter from another Fiend {I irriterate once again edited and partial for the same reasons }


the if you look further into it. Earth is not only going to be changing on its axis, but our position on a galactic scale will be changing. That is we, earth, will no longer be at the top of the pizza pie of our solar system but the lower end of it. At the same time we do this we will be having some of the most severe sun bursts of our time. Now, some think and which is what I have mentioned to you that this galactic and planetary alignment will provide the Gate of God to open...in other words in Biblical text and Native American they mention a star coming into sight. This star is considered to be a sign mentioned by Jesus to be a coming of the Apocalypse. The Gate of God opening. Now, if Gate of Man is open at the same time. and by this I think it means on a conscious level many people will be saved, if not many people will forever be thrown into the eternal fire. Now give what you have mentioned of the Ra text and what I have read of the Bible and other text they all mention a Harvest, a saving of people that are able to be saved. In other words, those that 'hear' the calling. What if this virus inhibits the experience of the calling. Or is aimed to do so in that many sheep will forever be lost...this eternal fire is the burning of the sun as the solar wave flares. Our planet will not be annihilated...because we will be shifting in galactic position. However, people will still die. We can not survive but Earth can. Not even if we hide thousands of feet into the earth crust and here is why. The cooling of the planet after the heating of the planet will cause a type of dying off. It is how in medical field we kill cancer that is superficial on the tissue. We freeze, dry, freeze dry freeze dry. This causes the cells to die. You get the gist...earth will heat, then cool as the position changes. Then the middle of the earth will begin to heat to a high point as the top portion will be too cool for it to release its heat. Eventually there will be an eruption of the heat due to the center becoming too hot and storing too much heat. This same event happen million of years ago. It is believe how earth evolved...as the heat erupts through the freeze (which will have stored oxygen that was emitted from the sun burst and that was already present) So massive amounts of oxygen will be freed from the ice, water, and heat. Now, who and what and why is trying to prevent people from 'hearing' the calling to be saved.

To be Continued I am Sure..
Gemstar